Episode notes, devotionals, and Bible study writing — 22 posts and counting.
22 posts
Eschatology, as a field of study, seeks to understand the final events of history and the ultimate destiny of humanity. While this subject has been a focus of interest for Christians for centuries, it is also an area of significant debate and disagreement among scholars and theologians.
Prophetic language is a common feature in the Bible, and it is important to understand its use and meaning in order to fully appreciate the message being conveyed. One aspect of prophetic language is the use of symbols, which are not arbitrarily picked but are consistent throughout scripture. Symbols are a powerful way to communicate deeper meanings and convey complex ideas.
The resurrection is a profound topic that shapes Christian belief and hope. To engage with it meaningfully, we can follow the example of the Bereans in Acts 17:11. They listened to the Apostle Paul but did not accept his teachings blindly. Instead, they examined the Scriptures daily to determine the truth. In the same way, readers today are encouraged to explore various perspectives on the resurrection—especially Full Preterism and Partial Preterism.
Another date has come and gone, and once again the predicted “rapture” failed to arrive. Some quit their jobs, sold homes, and unloaded possessions, convinced they were about to vanish. Others didn’t go to such extremes, but still wondered:
Dispensationalism, a theological view prevalent in many evangelical circles for over a century, is losing ground. As someone observing and studying this movement, I have concluded that it is crumbling before our very eyes. There are several reasons for this.
The book of Daniel is a prophetic text set in this tumultuous period in Jewish history. Daniel was among the captives taken to Babylon in 597 BCE. The book describes the experiences of Daniel and his friends as they navigate the challenges of living in a foreign land while remaining faithful to their God.
As an interpretive framework in Eschatology, some people provide an understanding of the passage, Matthew 24:15-22, through a specific lens. According to “pop-eschatology,” this passage refers to a future event known as the "Great Tribulation,” or what some refer to as the "time of Jacob's trouble" described in the book of Daniel and other prophetic texts. But does it? And is this even the best light to understand this text? Let us examine the passage today.
The book of Daniel is one of the most intriguing and enigmatic books of the Old Testament. It's a book that contains a wealth of prophetic passages that have captivated readers for centuries. These prophecies provide a glimpse into the future, with many already fulfilled and others still awaiting their fulfillment.
Preterism is a school of thought within Christian eschatology, which deals with the study of end times and final events in the history of humanity. Preterism is characterized by the belief that many or most of the biblical prophecies about the end of the world and the Second Coming of Christ have already been fulfilled in the past, specifically in the first century A.D. during the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.
I previously mentioned that I was introduced to the Bible at a young age. Even though I was not baptized as a Jehovah's Witness, my initial exposure to theology and eschatology was through their perspective. I learned that prophecy is when God foretells events that will happen in the future. I still believe this definition holds up today, predominantly as it is expressed in texts such as Isaiah in the Old Testament, where it is made clear that God declares the end from the beginning and is, therefore, in control of human affairs. As for the book of Revelation, I was taught a prophecy predicted future events. However, I never questioned whose future it was referring to; I assumed it was my own. Consequently, whenever I encountered prophecy in the Bible, I interpreted it as a forecast of my personal future. This was due to my habit of internalizing and personalizing every biblical text I read, regardless of its context.
A Berean Post Investigative Series by Dwaine Senechal
I recently watched a video where a man claimed to have spent several years investigating the identity of the Antichrist. It probably won't surprise him, but he concluded Prince Charles is the Antichrist. Of course, people attempting to identify the Antichrist is not a new phenomenon, as there have been several candidates since the time of Christ who have been purported to be the Antichrist.
Captivating Summary
I was raised a Jehovah’s Witness.
In today's discussion, we will explore how examining Bible prophecies without a preconceived interpretation imposed on the text and considering the Scriptures, historical context, and original audience can significantly impact one’s understanding of the prophecies in the Bible. Specifically, this could influence how one would interpret the Olivet discourse, the prophecies in Daniel, and many aspects of the prophecies found in the book of Revelation.
"Let no man deceive you" -Jesus
The Discovery
The Viral Claim
Introduction
The concept of prophecy is essential to the Judeo-Christian tradition, and it plays a significant role in shaping the beliefs and practices of many people of faith. One question that often arises is whether a biblical prophecy can have multiple fulfillments. In this blog post, I'll explore this question and examine some of its issues.
The second chapter of the book of Daniel in the Bible contains a prophetic account of a dream that King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon had. According to the account, the king's dream was so profound that it left him in a state of great anxiety, and he was determined to find its meaning. However, he could not remember the details of the dream, which created a significant problem for the king and his wise men, who were summoned to interpret the dream but could not do so because they needed to know it. The situation resulted in the king ordering the execution of all his wise men, including Daniel and his friends.
For centuries, the church was more than a preaching center. It was a cultural engine—founding schools, building hospitals, challenging slavery, and shaping the laws of nations. But something changed. As Dispensational Premillennialism rose in the mid-1800s, the church began to retreat from kingdom work, narrowing its mission to soul-winning and prophecy charts. The results were profound.